Pop & Policy was the industry conference and workshop component of the Pop Montreal festival, hosted by McGill's Schulich School of Music. My sister dragged me to the Friday afternoon panels as her law professor had suggested they attend. This cost 15$, worthwhile as I acquired three CDs (one festival sampler, two handed out by one of the panelists making good on his music-should-be-free ideology), plus coffee, snacks, and drinks/appetizers at the ensuing cocktail. XD Also the talks were interesting. The first pitted DJs and academics against industry lawpersons in a discussion of copyright and sampling, and the second was about legal challenges/ramifications to the DMCA and alternative models of online music distribution (other than "sue the pants off downloaders"). There were some fair bigshots, like Terry Fisher. This was followed by a round table with Patti Smith being interviewed by a journalist.
The hilarious thing about the copyright/sampling panel was that it was, in its essence, the exact same argument that comes up re: the legal viability of fanfiction. Just substitute hiphop/DJ culture for fanwork culture, keeping constant the catalytic influence of the anonymous internets, the "old-fashioned" artists who actually care about maintaining control over the integrity of their work, and the intellectual-property lawyers. Putting representatives of the several groups on the same panel was like
metafandom essayists versus - say - Robin Hobb's agent; it was that testy. The former group ranted rather idealistically about corporations but it's a red herring really; once the labels are out of the picture (and they will be soon) one runs up against other artists, as often as not those who - like Prince or Patti Smith herself - fought their own labels to retain artistic control. Having acquired said control they're unlikely ever to grok the necessity of relinquishing it to the next poxy-faced sixteen-year-old comer who wants to take a two-second snippet of their recording and Do Stuff to it. I've said somewhere that if I published a novel I'd consider it a failure on at least one front if people didn't write fic for it that completely twisted my artistic directive to suit their own ends, but then I came up through the fanwork culture too. XD;
Anyway. Less with the meta, more with the gig review.
( The tenets of Flickr popularity: delicious food, hipster girls, and Patrick Wolf smeared in glitter )
Seriously, it normally takes me two weeks to get 15 hits on a Flickr entry. XD; I tend to feel a bit useless about posting gig pics, because it's not like I have great equipment, and a cursory search will usually turn up dozens of better shots. But so far mine are the only ones up of the Montreal show. What happened to the other ten people schlepping cameras in the front row? Who knows.
The hilarious thing about the copyright/sampling panel was that it was, in its essence, the exact same argument that comes up re: the legal viability of fanfiction. Just substitute hiphop/DJ culture for fanwork culture, keeping constant the catalytic influence of the anonymous internets, the "old-fashioned" artists who actually care about maintaining control over the integrity of their work, and the intellectual-property lawyers. Putting representatives of the several groups on the same panel was like
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
Anyway. Less with the meta, more with the gig review.
( The tenets of Flickr popularity: delicious food, hipster girls, and Patrick Wolf smeared in glitter )
Seriously, it normally takes me two weeks to get 15 hits on a Flickr entry. XD; I tend to feel a bit useless about posting gig pics, because it's not like I have great equipment, and a cursory search will usually turn up dozens of better shots. But so far mine are the only ones up of the Montreal show. What happened to the other ten people schlepping cameras in the front row? Who knows.