Unlocked yesterday's meta post in case anyone wanted to, yanno, refute me publically or something. XD Although I was talking to
worldserpent afterward and it made me think that I didn't manage to properly state my thesis. I have a headache so this is going to come out sounding more irritated than it should, but: it is not so much people who criticise and/or exhaustively analyze and/or make fun of and/or negatively review other people's fic who get my goat (I have my doubts regarding motivation in some instances but it serves me not a whit to be cynical, especially as a generalisation). It is the fact that writers are routinely called whiners for daring not to like it that gets my goat. Most writers are not going to like it, in the amateur or professional arena. If one is to judge them on how well they bite their tongues one may as well judge their readers on how well they bite their tongues. I do judge, to a degree: the ability to bite one's tongue is a sign of maturity and civility. But it's both sides or none.
(Charmian and I part ways on this issue like no other, because in the age-long war between critic and writer her allegiances are entirely with the former and mine with the latter. XD She would rather read a meta-dissection of a fic than the fic itself, and I would rather a hundred badfics be praised uncritically to the skies than one goodfic go unposted because the - admittedly wussypants - writer was intimidated by the tenor of discourse in her fandom. As fannish attitudes run both are fairly extreme, I think.
I have had people tell me they can't imagine what my and Charmian's MSN conversations are like. XDDDDD)
As for the rest I was just trying to explain what a freak I am personally. ^^;v
dipping_sauce linked me to
isiscolo's entries on the beta process, which I found highly illuminating (well, all this stuff may well be obvious to someone else XD). In fact it goes some way to explaining why I keep rewriting other people's fic when I beta - I do all this stuff for myself, when I say "I'm going to post this and look at it again" or "I'm going to wait until tomorrow morning and look at it again", and I'm so used to doing it for myself that I never saw identifying the problem and fixing the problem as two separate steps. "Here's the issue; now you take care of it." It must be so... different... not to be a control freak. XD;;;
In other news: what do you mean, Russian LoGH fans aren't all male and yaoi-friendly? XDXDXDXD
In other-other news: WHY AM I NOT IN SINGAPORE.
(Charmian and I part ways on this issue like no other, because in the age-long war between critic and writer her allegiances are entirely with the former and mine with the latter. XD She would rather read a meta-dissection of a fic than the fic itself, and I would rather a hundred badfics be praised uncritically to the skies than one goodfic go unposted because the - admittedly wussypants - writer was intimidated by the tenor of discourse in her fandom. As fannish attitudes run both are fairly extreme, I think.
I have had people tell me they can't imagine what my and Charmian's MSN conversations are like. XDDDDD)
As for the rest I was just trying to explain what a freak I am personally. ^^;v
In other news: what do you mean, Russian LoGH fans aren't all male and yaoi-friendly? XDXDXDXD
In other-other news: WHY AM I NOT IN SINGAPORE.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 05:15 pm (UTC)mmm? they aren't? i hadn't noticed.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 05:20 pm (UTC)...speaking of which, picked up a *gorgeous* Gaiden poster at Otakon: Sieg and Reinhard and a bunch of people I don't know, and OMG*so*CUTE!!!...
...yeah.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-24 05:29 am (UTC)Secondly - there is a whole community for russian LOGH fans:
http://www.livejournal.com/community/logh_ru/
with 300+ comment threads and some very, very sharp people involved.
However, they happen to be vehemently anti-yaoi. Their kicks are politics, multi-layered intrigue and discussing the nitty-gritty of each of the Oberstein's little maneuvers. ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-24 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-24 12:58 pm (UTC)(Congrats on the find. XD)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-24 01:05 pm (UTC)I mean, hell, there are plenty of other series out there that are *far* more obscure. Granted, there's also a *reason* for that, but that's neither here nor anywhere...
no subject
Date: 2005-08-24 01:42 pm (UTC)I mean, hell, there are plenty of other series out there that are *far* more obscure. Granted, there's also a *reason* for that, but that's neither here nor anywhere...
Ahh sigh. I suppose the dated art and unremarkable beginning aren't terribly effective fan draws -- of the half-dozen or so people I've managed to drag firmly into the fandom, most spent the first few episodes BREAKING MY HEART by mocking everything in sight. (Of course, I claim the last laugh. *g*)
Was talking to a friend who mentioned that what she found attractive about the series was its consistency in terms of characterization and plot, how everything was played through to its (often painful or sordid) conclusion -- the kind of quality that would take a few eps to become apparent, while most people have no reason (= person with Big Stick hounding them to watch) to stick with it that long.
Conclusion: More LoGH fans should employ Big Sticks.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-24 01:48 pm (UTC)Like Sue Shambaugh said, 'Boring Hapsburgs in Space'...and that is *all* you ever need to know.
...having said that, sometimes, mocking is just *too* easy. Golden Wings/stroke it, STRO-O-O-KE IT!!!...anyone?
no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 11:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-24 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-24 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-24 05:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 06:46 pm (UTC)But seriously, my sympathies, like Charmain, lie towards the critic more than the writer. In the end genius works for an audience, and everyone's a critic.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-23 11:25 pm (UTC)