Page Summary
acchikocchi.livejournal.com - (no subject)
naanima.livejournal.com - (no subject)
arboretum - (no subject)
bell - (no subject)
meril.livejournal.com - (no subject)
analyse.livejournal.com - well in this case, IT WOULD'VE, huh :s
marej.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sub-divided.livejournal.com - (no subject)
supacat.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Early Edition for Five AM by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 08:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 08:48 am (UTC)I'm kind of 2 minds in regards to Evan. Where you rooting for Chan?
no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 09:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 09:09 am (UTC)Also, because I understand your pain.
SP - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzpSaHpajaQ
LP - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFhj0-ZbASQ
He did this program a few years ago where he nailed 2 quads in the first minute or so.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 03:49 pm (UTC)We're not allowed to root for Plushenko in this household due to hangover from sororial unit's Yagudin fandom. XD I've always enjoyed watching him, mind you, but that wasn't his A-game last night. Or maybe his A-game is wobbly now; it comes to everyone in the end.
My real problem is violent and quasi-unreasoning dislike for Lysacek. XD; It's distressing: figure skating is my favorite sport, or at least the one I have the most history with, and as with most of my fandoms I'm pretty easy - I usually like everyone! I've never hated any skater this badly before! And to have the one dude I hate go from US team second-stringer to Olympic gold medalist in four years!
I also feel really bad about Oda's skate. Fair does to Takahashi and Johnny Weir's moral victory, though.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 06:40 pm (UTC)Yes, exactly, it's so bad I was actually rooting for Plushenko and I was a Yagudin fan for quite some time. Just. WHY.
And the NBC commentary team, as usual, did nothing to help.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 02:33 pm (UTC)(I - and probably many others - have slightly more personal reasons for not being a fan as well, mostly to do with homophobia, but I try not to let that biase me too much because 1) nothing is proven, and 2) the system is much more of a problem than any individual skater.)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-20 02:18 am (UTC)Ah! That makes more sense now, and I understand the way you feel completely. I want to be objective towards Lysacek but at the same time I can't get over the fact that he skated a 'safe' program; attempted no quads, did NOT push himself to be amazing. It galls me that a 'safe' program won the Olympic gold when Takahashi who attempted the quad and Plushenko who went for it didn't get gold. I mean, isn't the Olympic all about pushing the human limit? Yes, I understand that artistry and foot work and transition is required as well, but dammit, there were skaters out there who PUSHED and wanted to be better and I turn around and Lysacek perform one of the most boringest of programs, and I just want to hit things
So, um, yes I understand your pain (oh gods, you have no idea how diplomatic I had to be with several people in the past 24 hours or so). However, I HOLD onto the belief that Takahashi will be kicking his ass in the World Championship.
Also, OMFG! Weir did AMAZINGLY! And you are right, the moral victory is worth it!
no subject
Date: 2010-02-20 02:36 am (UTC)I understand that quads is not required to win the Olympics or any other World Championships, however, I also believe it should be attempted to push the sport. I don't think having figure skating be about a series of ticks on checklist is the way to go, but at the same time I think stamina and better jumps should be part of component for marking.
ARGH! See, it is hard to articulate how I feel about the new scoring system. All I know is that I did not want Lysacek to win because he is boring, because he doesn't push the sport, because he pretty much go through the checklist and TICK everyone for his program, which is frigging boring.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 09:05 am (UTC)?
just curious :D
i wasn't really a fan of either lysacek or plushenko so mostly just wanted to see some people skate well.... which i guess they didn't so much lol. but feel ambivalent about the medals.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 04:02 pm (UTC)Ironically the Plushenko-Lysacek skates (let alone Lambiel's etc.) have proven conclusively that it isn't about the quad.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 11:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 04:08 pm (UTC)In short, I hate the guy who won, have long-term fan enmity for the second-place guy but would have preferred him even so, and basically thought anyone else in the running deserved to place higher than they actually did. Except now what I think is deserving is simply not taken into account in the marking.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 07:21 pm (UTC)i mostly watch figure skating to be entertained so have been / remain pretty clueless about the actual judging system, but i feel like i recall people complaining, some years back, that it was all about the quad, which meant good jumpers like plushenko automatically had a leg up on the competition, whether or not they did good choreography, & everyone else who wanted a chance at a medal was trying to land quads even if they were terrible at them, b/c there was just no way else to score high enough. :-?
no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 03:08 pm (UTC)I actually agree heartily with the principle behind implementing the new points system, but the difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there's no difference between theory and practice - you know?
In practice:
* Pushing the athletic envelope re: jumps is not rewarded (see Plushenko)
* Pushing the artistic envelope re: style is not rewarded (see Weir)
* Innovation in footwork and spins, ironically, is not rewarded (they "count" now, so gotta nail that clean form exactly as the criteria has it defined! see ski moguls earlier in the week for another example of this, literally 97% of the women did the exact same two jumps in the exact same order)
* Judges can still punish skaters if they don't like the cut of their sequins, only no individual score breakdown now so when the French lady gives a 5.3 when everyone else gave a 5.9 it's not transparent to viewers
* Actually, the TV audience doesn't really understand how the score's totted up at all, unless they're hardcore enough to have memorized all the routines in advance and are actually sitting at home with a checklist
IDK, man, obviously the goal is possible or gymnastics would be over as a sport, but this is not the way.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-19 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 02:35 pm (UTC)well in this case, IT WOULD'VE, huh :s
Date: 2010-02-20 05:50 am (UTC)"Skating without a quad... I'm sorry is not men's figure skating"
vs
"A quad does not make you a man!"
no subject
Date: 2010-02-21 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-22 01:46 am (UTC)I hate the way the new scoring system is applied to pairs skating. You can see them asking themselves, okay, I have five seconds here, is there any way I can touch my toes in a semi-artistic way? Aw screw artistry, is there any way I can touch my toes period?
no subject
Date: 2010-02-22 03:26 am (UTC)