Kudos sort on AO3
Nov. 9th, 2012 12:36 pmGood idea in the short run, bad idea in the long run -- not for social reasons, but because it'll probably make incumbent advantage more advantageous to the point of reducing the value of the peer review itself. I mean, there are forces that work against that too, and everyone has their compensation heuristics, but it's not necessary.
EDIT -- working it through... before this you had to sort by hits, then scan down the page for kudos/hits ratio, which is more indicative than either metric by itself (baseline also differs by fandom size, fandom maturity, and fandom who-the-heck-knows, but all this is heuristic). Geez I have to get off the computer though
EDIT -- working it through... before this you had to sort by hits, then scan down the page for kudos/hits ratio, which is more indicative than either metric by itself (baseline also differs by fandom size, fandom maturity, and fandom who-the-heck-knows, but all this is heuristic). Geez I have to get off the computer though
no subject
Date: 2012-11-10 01:28 am (UTC)** OTOH if the story is pr0ny, especially if it's trashily pr0ny, ppl will kudo but they won't bookmark publically (private bookmarks don't show up even to the author, I guess?), because that makes a statement on your own profile. XD Case in point, those two Avengers stories I wrote. Two chapters each, similar wordcounts. The pr0ny one has twice as many hits and more than twice as many kudos, but it has about the same number of public bookmarks.
no subject
Date: 2012-11-10 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-11-12 04:46 am (UTC)