I think the reason this has been so incoherent is because anti-warnings people don't actually know why warnings rub them the wrong way, to the extent that they're willing to be assholes about it. The whole idea certain rubs me the wrong way - violently - and I have been an ass about it in the past, and I still don't know why this is. But at least I'm honest with myself (and you XD;) regarding that.
It is not consistent either. Like, in practice I'm pretty sure that when I've written shota/dubcon in the past I've warned for it, if not formally then words to that effect. (Maybe I just don't like the idea of formally labelling everything? A story is not a list of ingredients. For fun Charmian made up a warning tag list for The Alexandria Quartet last night, and it was like, what sort of book would you imagine if you saw this?) I'll see myself banned from fandom before I slap a deathfic warning on "A Proof By Contradiction", though. Of course third-party reccers can do as they like.
It is not consistent either. Like, in practice I'm pretty sure that when I've written shota/dubcon in the past I've warned for it, if not formally then words to that effect. (Maybe I just don't like the idea of formally labelling everything? A story is not a list of ingredients. For fun Charmian made up a warning tag list for The Alexandria Quartet last night, and it was like, what sort of book would you imagine if you saw this?) I'll see myself banned from fandom before I slap a deathfic warning on "A Proof By Contradiction", though. Of course third-party reccers can do as they like.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-25 06:52 pm (UTC)Could it be? Yeah. The reductionist aspect of it is what rubs *my* fur the wrong way.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-25 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-25 09:37 pm (UTC)All that being said, I guess now that the pro-warning argument has been re-framed in terms of triggers, it really does convince me to work at some sort of compromise, at least for myself...
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 02:10 am (UTC)This is not a particularly positive statement for you to have made (XD) but thank god for you, this is totally it, I've been struggling all day to figure out why we go through these same cycles of arguments over and over again and I think that's the reason. Because while the pro-warning side has a specific, well, bone to pick, the anti-warning side seems to be consistently just poking back hysterically with pitchforks and going, "...AND STAY OUT OF MY LAWN >:E!" without being able to articulate why.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 03:15 am (UTC)SO WHAT'S THE PROBLEM YOU HAVE WITH FURRIES, HUH
... has something been going on? XD Where do these things go on, anyway, I'm always so disconnected until you or
charmian or someone brings something up....
My very long winded 2c.
Date: 2009-06-26 03:37 am (UTC)But there are some warnings that I think, absolutely, should be labeled. Non-con and child molestation, to name two. Is it reductionist? Yeah. But so is labeling stories slash, het, yaoi, or naming specific pairings, isn't it?
As someone who was molested, I really have -zero- desire to read detailed descriptions of non-con or molestation in fic. I guess you could say it is kind of a trigger? But I have, in some ways, come to grips with my own experiences. My problem is more that the majority of fic I have read that touch on the subject tend to well....romanticize or almost fetishize the subject. It is revolting to me on a very fundamental level.
As an example, in the Criminal Minds fandom I have this recurring problem. It is canon for the show that one of the main characters was molested as a boy. In the show, he reacts and attempts to cover up the evidence of this molestation in a fairly realistic manner. Now, in fic, I have repeatedly come across stories where there is no warnings and then *bam* in the middle of the story a detailed narrative of the molestation. Ok, so I can't complain too much, it's canon after all, right? Except these fic frequently eroticize the molestation, and suddenly the very masculine and emotionally distant main character is weeping or talking about how he's so ashamed of how he's really dirty on the inside. Or trying to wash away the memory of the molestation by sleeping with _____ male protagonist because he's now in love.
I just. I don't know. I get that if you haven't been abused it's probably hard to understand what kind of emotional ennui that brings with it. And I'm not saying that doesn't mean a person can't write it if they haven't lived it. But as someone who has lived it, I'd like some fair warning so I can chose to give it a wide berth.
and my icon applied to me, apparently
Date: 2009-06-26 03:41 am (UTC)Go me!
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 04:41 am (UTC)I actually detest warnings for things like slash or het, though because of community rules I've had to put "poly" on some of my fics. It makes me irrationally angry, probably because, as you say, it encourages stereotypes.
"O hai it's poly, must be a pwp orgy, right?" *facepalm*
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 04:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 04:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 04:54 am (UTC)Re: and my icon applied to me, apparently
Date: 2009-06-26 05:00 am (UTC)If I could get away with not labelling things slash, BL, yaoi, gen etc. I would. (In fact I mostly do get away with it.) To be fair, it's not so much an issue for me personally in that I rarely write anything that could be construed as disturbing. ^^;
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 05:05 am (UTC)I think we agree that the idea of fandom being a "safe space" is dumb to begin with.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 05:21 am (UTC)But in the end I think people really should at least clearly state "I do not give warnings" if they're anti-warning. It's a simple enough thing to do.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 12:35 pm (UTC)Cultural Revolution
Yes, *exactly*. I kept hearing huge CR riffs throughout this. Also the early woman's movement when everyone was so considerate of everyone else's space that nothing could be said without a million disclaimers. (Except by the bullies, who worked the system to shut everyone else up. God the 70s sucked. Not that certain 'feminists' ever stopped doing that, mind.)
no subject
Date: 2009-06-26 01:41 pm (UTC)Re: My very long winded 2c.
Date: 2009-06-26 03:33 pm (UTC)I've had discussions with
no subject
Date: 2009-07-05 06:34 am (UTC)